Protection of human rights and armed conflict Essay

Protection of human rights and build up conflict - Essay ExampleHumanitarian encumbrance is primarily motivated by humane objectives moreover in near of the cases there are strategic motives attached to the military action and the integrity and sovereignty of the state against which the action is taken is challenged which is totally against the UN charter and international law. There are no criteria established for humanitarian intervention to decide when, how and under what circumstances it becomes inevitable to intervene in the internal personal business of a sovereign state. The issue of humanitarian intervention has become the most debatable one invariably since the end of the Cold War period because there are two schools of thoughts, one which considers it to be rattling legitimate, legal and essential for the establishment of UN human rights charter in each and e real country of the area while others challenge its legality on the grounds of being against the sovereig nty of a state (Murphy, 1996). The strain discusses the legality and effectiveness of the humanitarian intervention with reference to various incidents of humanitarian intervention and peace trading operations in different regions of the world. Various different definitions drive been presented by scholars from different schools of thoughts. ... The supporters of humanitarian intervention deem the objective of provision of fundamental human rights to each and every individual in this world the root word of their support of external interference in the affairs of a state. The scholars and debaters who do not support the topic of humanitarian intervention argue on the basis of the Article 2(4) of the UN Charter which restricts the use of force against both sovereign state. They further argue that humanitarian intervention for the restoration of fundamental human rights can be used as a way of achieving the political and strategic goals by the countries that are imposing a milit ary expedition on a country and this kind of abuse of humanitarian intervention is very easy to carry out. Under such circumstances the humanitarian intervention can never be effective enough to achieve the primary goals of the protection of human rights (Jokic, 2003). There are incidents in which humanitarian intervention has aggravated the violation of human rights in the affected areas. The military personnel of the peace retention forces are sometimes involved in the violation of human rights. The deciding authority, the UN auspices Council in most of the cases is a big question on the legitimacy and efficacy of the humanitarian intervention because certain states have political and strategic motives associated with the governances of certain states. For example recent scenario in Sudan where most of the states in the United Nations Security Council were in favor of a military intervention by UN forces, China had other plans because of its ties with the Sudanese government ba sed on oil supply contracts between the two. In the following pages the effectiveness of humanitarian intervention